Guest2 wrote:
With all due respect, I looked at your web page and there is nothing incontrovertible about anything you have written. You present nothing more than your beliefs and propaganda. For example, in your Alien Psychology section, you describe the cause for wars as economic. I quote, "The idea of warfare can come only to insufficiently developed civilizations, in which war is a means of resolving economic problems by seizing the natural resources of the conquered country through various political manipulations (for example by establishing a puppet government by the victor). This dynamic is clear in the US war with Iraq."
I immediately see two things wrong with this statement. The first is that you are implying war is due to economics but yet you ignore many other factors such as religion and oppression. And secondly, you try to draw a correlation between your beliefs and the US war in Iraq. The war in Iraq never had anything to do with WMD's or oil, it was simply a case of revenge since Saddam tried to kill George Jr's daddy. Your belief that the US wants to steal Iraqi oil stems from Russian propaganda since all the contracts Russia signed with Saddam were made null and void with the US invasion. There is absolutely no evidence that American oil companies are setting up camp to monopolize Iraqi oil. In fact, it is the Iraqi's themselves who are in control of their own oil, not the US.
Outrageous claims require outrageous evidence and you have presented none. Until you can present hard core evidence instead of flimsy...
Well I can not talk about the site that you visited. I can however let you know that you're wrong on the war not being
economic in nature and about oil.
The US went into Iraq after Sadam started selling oil for Euro's instead of the USD. The United States acted swiftly to ensure that oil would remain dominantly a dollar commodity, by an executive order empowering Iraqi oil sales to be returned from euros to dollars. Bush’s order of May 22, 2003, declaring a “national emergency,” did not directly mention the dollar as such; but it directed all oil earnings into a central fund, controlled by the United States, for reconstruction projects in Iraq. The Financial Times, on June 6, 2003, confirmed that Iraqi oil sales were now switched back from euros to dollars.
Donald Rumsfeld, who on November 14, 2002 told CBS News that the U.S. plans for Iraq had “nothing to do with oil, literally nothing to do with oil." As it became increasingly clear in 2003 that America would invade Iraq, neither Bush's State of the Union Message nor Colin Powell's address to the United Nations Security Council mentioned, even once, the word "oil."
But we now know that in March 2001 Cheney's Energy Task Force developed a map of Iraq’s oil fields, with the southwest divided into nine “Exploration Blocks.” One month earlier a Bush National Security Council document had noted that Cheney’s Task force would consider “actions regarding the capture of new and existing oil and gas fields.”
For eight years the Bush-Cheney administration, in a number of ways, pushed for the Iraq Ministry of Oil to eliminate state control of oil and negotiate contracts giving Chevron and other multinationals access to Iraqi oilfields. These negotiations have continued under Obama, and Bloomberg reported in April that the Iraqi government might give foreign companies 75 percent stakes in new oil developments.
Source: Oil and
Islam / The Historical Importance to America of Dollar-Denominated Oil (Prof. Peter Dale Scott)