Guest wrote:Oh, now I get it. Obama is not a Socialist because he didn't nationalize the whole economy. Is that
like being a little bit pregnant?
Isn't that a little like comparing apples to oranges? I asked you for examples of Obama Socializing America. I'm still waiting. BTW, part ownership in the companies engaging in corporate welfare is a far cry from socialism. It's a way to guarantee the tax payers get something for their money. What would you call a bank foreclosing on your property for failure to pay your mortgage? Socialism?
I made reference to WWII and the Soviets in response to the silly remark made by the biscuit eating Guest.
Why do you find it necessary to insult another just because of their nationality?
Seems like the people screaming the loudest for isolationism are the labor unions.
Uh, no, they're not. They're screaming for protectionism and fair trade with China. Isolationism is a quite a bit different.
I did not watch the video and probably will not. I was not a huge Bush fan, I am no fan of the Obama
Administration. Given enough time they will install a Socialist government.
I'm glad to know you were no fan of Bush, because he was, and is, an idiot. And as far as I'm concerned, a war criminal too. But Obama hasn't been in office long enough for you to make such a claim. And this is still the USA, with a government by the people and for the people. If Obama was taking this nation in a socialist direction, he wouldn't last long as president. He would be impeached! Anyway, I see nothing wrong with a little bit of socialism. Welfare programs, for example, that help others dig themselves out of poverty or to be able to provide for their family. And before you object, I'm not talking about a free hand out. Welfare recipients should be required to earn their welfare check, the same as you and I working at a job.
Yes, the UK has always stood by us and we are grateful for that.
Hey, don't forget Australia! And France too! Especially when we needed them most! I would say that more than qualifies as Europe helping the USA, a budding nation. Without their help we would probably living in the United States of Canada. Not that this would be a bad thing. I only mention it to make a point.
Corporate Bushism, political fringe (conservatives?), neo-conservatives. Maybe so. But there many of
us who do not want a collectivist government. If you do, that is fine with me.
I ask again, how is taking part ownership in a company who received corporate welfare a collectivist government? Many of the businesses that did receive a hand out have already paid back their debt and are no longer under the thumb of the federal government. Is that socialism?
"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent
virtue is the equal sharing of misery" - Sir Winston Churchill
engineerretired
Oh, really? I grew up on welfare. I wore second hand clothes and ate government surplus food. There were many nights I went to bed hungry. I never saw the rest of America sharing in my misery. As for socialism (welfare) being a failure, I am now a successful member of middle class America and I have no objections to giving back. I pay my fair share and am glad to do it if it means others will have the same chance I did. It's called being an empathetic human who believes all, regardless their situation, deserve the same rights that everyone else has.
BTW, America's (and Europe's) success was built on the misery of others. As a capitalist (which I am too), do you believe it's right to exploit the natural resources of those who benefit nothing from it? Not that I'm implying anything, I'm just curious.
Peace!
fuzoid
http://www.live365.com/stations/fuzoid

News