Before you actually "give" up, fuzoid... try reading the graph and link I provided in the initial post.

engineerretired wrote:fuzoid:

You are being unkind. There is about as much a connection as, lets say you spilled your coffee at breakfast and when you went to your garage, the car wouldn't start.

Hyperdimensional physics did it. Get with the program.

engineerretired

Hi engineerretired!

Dang, I forgot all about that hyperdimensional physics. It gets me everytime. Thanks for setting me straight.

maxtheknife wrote:Before you actually "give" up, fuzoid... try reading the graph and link I provided in the initial post.

I already did. In fact, I've been aware of the possible existence of a brown dwarf star for some time now! And it does not support research in the Cydonia region of Mars. Or at least I see no connection. So instead of vague and cryptic responses, how about actually answering the question!

The Cydonia research blew my F****** mind, I understand the theory presented so far. But how does that discredit a binary star system and a brown dwarfs effects on our solar system? I didn't find a disassociation in there. Please clarify, and your welcome to continue explaining as if we were all 2 year olds.

NM156,

If I'm interpreting your post correctly...

But how does that discredit a binary star system and a brown dwarfs effects on our solar system?

It does NOT discredit a binary star system... The articles I've posted SUPPORT the explicit prediction made by Hoagland and myself that our Sun DOES have a dark companion.

See my first post to this thread.

I go into detail about how I (& ostensibly Hoagland) came to this conclusion towards the end of this page.

~~~~~~~~~

Fuzoid,

You obviously have read the SDC article but have NOT read the page linked above.

NM156 wrote:The Cydonia research blew my F****** mind, I understand the theory presented so far. But how does that discredit a binary star system and a brown dwarfs effects on our solar system? I didn't find a disassociation in there. Please clarify, and your welcome to continue explaining as if we were all 2 year olds.

It would help if you backquoted that which you are responding to. As it is I can't tell if your response is for me or Max. I'm going to assume me based on the context. Then again....

I never denied that we may be in a binary system with a brown dwarf star. In fact, I believe it is highly likely based on the evidence so far (and it's not Nibiru). Nor have I said that a brown dwarf companion would not have a gravitational influence on our solar system. What I was questioning is Max' assertion that its existence supports research of the Cydonia region of Mars. I don't see the connection. But if you do, please, enlighten the rest of us because it appears Max has no interest in supporting his claims. Thanks!

fuzoid wrote:Okay, I give, how exactly would a brown dwarf star support research into the Cydonia region of Mars?

Amen to that!

The articles I've posted SUPPORT the explicit prediction made by Hoagland and myself that our Sun DOES have a dark companion.

The idea of a companion sun is an old one. What is more telling about your trick of mind is your claim that it is YOU and Hoagland only who have made explicit predictions.

There must be a medical term for that type of self belief.

maxtheknife wrote:Fuzoid,

You obviously have read the SDC article but have NOT read the page linked above.

Not for lack of trying. And Fool believes I'm long winded! Perhaps you could point me to a specific area in your blog, or whatever you choose to call it?

Anyway, it is as Probet stated, the idea of a companion sun is an old one. Claiming yours and Hoagland's research of the Cydonian region of Mars discovered the existence of a brown dwarf companion is a bit like making a prediction for WW1 and WW2 after the events have happened.

nd Fool believes I'm long winded!

With regards to forums, I'm lazier than I used to be. Which is why I don't e-kill people any more. But that's ok, I have you to do it for me