I have a few questions about this sema.
Mercury is currently around 18 degrees west of the sun. So in the morning perhaps you could see it, but you'd have to zoom out quite a way beyond the suns glare, and UP not DOWN. Perhaps a silhouette in the suns glare would be feasible, but that far away i doubt it - but hey, maybe. Sunset? Forget about it, Mercury is below the horizon.
The black comment is memikeme's idea. Apparently
Nibiru turns black in the presence of the suns rays. I laughed myself. Which, of course, would render it invisible to his camera.
We agree on the
Nibiru's orbital path between us and the sun and its effects. The size, well thats one of my points - why can't anybody agree on the size. Even you screw around with it?
The
asteroid belt has always been there. The total mass contained within it, is still only a fraction of our
Moon. It never has, nor will form even a planet because there is simply f*ck all out there. Sure you'll get collisions occasionally, but even then you'd never put together an object massive enough to start drawing in the rest of the belt. The accepted and logical explanation is that this is material left over from the planetary disc. Also, we have seen these asteroids with probes, covered in dust chewed up by billions of years of meteor and micrometeorite impacts, cosmic rays etc.
There are no glaring holes in the
asteroid belt. How can you say this when anyone can look at a map on an astronomy website?
All the planets slope at angles. Axial tilt right. Did you know it fluctuates in cycles? Nice smooth cycles. Ours is around 41 000 years. Also, these tilts vary greatly from planet to planet. Suggesting, to me anyway, that they are not mutually exclusive. Rather, a natural planetary process.
I won't knock the possibility of a brown dwarf companion to our sun. But I will knock the idea that one planet can orbit both, when the stars them selves are orbiting. Not only does
Nibiru manage that, but you can predict its orbital trajectory in advance when it would be different each time. At any rate, such an orbit...it would have to be intelligent.
Nibiru rounds the sun, heads back out - but meanwhile the brown dwarf has moved further along its own orbit.
Nibiru would have to get quite close to a star of that size before it was affected by its gravity.
Nibiru is pretty big itself and would take some shifting. If the star is in a different place each time, then
Nibiru is going to miss it each time.
You call others stupid but openly entertain such an outlandish theory.
Oh and the best for last, the piece that proves without a doubt you haven't got a clue.
Planets appearing to move backwards. Ever heard of direct and retrograde motion. It's entirely natural I assure you, and depends on where we are in our orbit compared with the orbit of the planet in question. This is observed in ALL planets. Imagine something 8 times the mass of the earth stopping Jupiter in its tracks and then reversing it. How would it do it so often when
Nibiru is only here a very small part of the time? Also, such a gravitational encounter would rip
Nibiru out of its own orbit.