I'm not scared, & I have clearly stated that the books that this sort of information comes from are quite old. I've listed all of my sources in my various posts. I've also said that people can read the same books & make up their own minds. As for Zechariah Sitchin, he is one of the 6 people on this planet who can speak, read & write ancient Sumerian & I know he has plenty of detractors- most of them religious oriented. What Sitchin has to say about ancient times & Nibiru shocks a good many people. IF the things I've posted are going to occur, shouldn't people be prepared in any event?

Science cannot measure faith. There is, quite frankly, a lot that it cannot do, not yet, anyway. It doesn't have all of the answers- which is why we're here on this site- sharing what we know. No one has to believe everything on it. Faith is what keeps most of us alive & going- not science. Science cannot "prove" the existence of a thought, yet we all think; the net is a great place to exchange ideas.

As for evidence of Nibiru's passing, the geology is worldwide. People have only just begun to be able to sort it out, as much of it is underwater. Old legends, stories & holy books have been proven true again & again. People thought Troy was only a legend told by Homer's poetry, but a German archaeologist named Schliemann found it & King Priam's treasure house- right where Homer said it was! It's outside of Iskanderun, east of Istanbul, in what is now Turkey.

It helps to be openminded enough to believe things could be possible. You never know. Yesterday's "magic" may become today's fact. Lot's of people know that the world could be in for a lot of trouble if things don't change soon. To be forwarned is to be forearmed. Deianera

Hi !

I am not sure if it all will happen in detail as you have written
how ever it is very clear that something omnious will happen the comming years
The sumerians were the cradle of the modern world and the root of the vedic empire (eventhough my fellow indians always deny than fact)
The sumerians clearly mentioned the fact that there are strange orbiting objects
Only a few years ago planets with strange orbits were discovered.
Very strange !
Because we are examening sky for many years. How come we have not seen this object before ? are there political reasons ?

I know onething for sure, the world is heading to a strange period and the change will not be a happy one.
It might be that the period thereafter will be very good.

I have calculated that the planets will have such a position that we are heading to a mini-icetime ...........
indeed 2011 and after.

from the first quarter 2009 onwards we will face calamaties worldhas never encountered before (modern humans)

.........

Hi, Martin Rai! Yes indeed, changes are coming. Your calculations for 2011 could be very well correct- the poles of the Earth shift from time to time, & it has been geologically proven that those shifts can cause ice ages. One of the delightful things about the Vedas is that some of the places mentioned in them have been found- one of them is the ancient citadel of the Rakshasas, which is under the sea off of Sri Lanka. It was the place that the demon Ravana took Sita to when he stole her from King Rama. Graham Hancock tells of it in his book "Underworld", & his Sri Lankan wife took many colour pictures of the place underwater- which are in the book & on their website! Google it up & check it out- Deianera

Deianera wrote:I've made a point of translating most of the near-1,000 prophecies over the years- ask me the right questions, & I may be able to give you some good answers- you can make up your own minds. You can email me at : deianera@fuse.net

Au revoir- 'bye for now- have hope & be informed! Knowledge is power. Deianera

Thanks and don't hesitate to share the docs in French as well. Nous sommes quelques uns à lire le français, ici...

Deianera wrote:Why do you even care? What evidence to the contrary have YOU got? Get out of the closet! Don't just bully people here on the net to pass the time- stick your own neck out, for once. TELL US WHY YOU THINK WE'RE WRONG! You hate us all for being, as you put it, "a bunch of religious idiots" but you never say a word about why a person of your sort is bothering with us here in the first place. Stop wasting your time! THERE IS A CODE OF CONDUCT FOR THIS SITE- & you're crossing the line. You won't be the first to have been blocked off of it! Deianera

And you can't prove the invisible pink unicorn, the flying spaghetti monster, or Russel's teapot. But what you do prove is that you are some very gullible people.

House Mouse wrote:Hello everyone !

It's snowing in Kenya...

THEN WE ARE DEFINATELY IN FOR TROUBLE!

the guy that posted the first artical.....GREAT !!!!!!.....the responder tried to suck you in to discredit you and succeded.....by the smallest of margins........he is good but not as good as me as he was the pupil i was warned about during my service,he,s goverment employed and this is his job,,,,do not EVER respond to this type,you will always lose because of the simple fact thatpeople always belive the last thing they hear,or read.......PLEASE REMEMBER THIS AND LETS GIVE THEM THE QUIET WALL IN RETURN,,,,,end......
look for quietmans replies.......his are much the same.....quotes ,implications and subtle infrastructures in his words

It snowed in Baghdad for the first time in recorded history this year.

It's all very well speculating on what's going to happen based on the records of civilizations long since gone but what proof do we have of an actual disaster apart from the fabulous cities left behind in South America? The answer is Stonehenge.

If you're familiar with this ancient site in England you've probably read that it was built around 5,000 years ago and deliberately aligned to the summer solstice sunrise. The age is based on a handful of radiocarbon dated samples of animal bone from the ditch that surrounds the site, and a single sample from the foundations of one of the central stones, however, many other samples were discarded when they didn't fit the expected timeline. If we consider the relationship to the summer solstice sunrise, not only is it not aligned as such, it is the only relationship to any event. Now, when you consider that Stonehenge is a precise arrangement of seventy-five stones weighing from 7 to 45 tons, you might expect there to be more debris leftover from excavating the foundations (with antler picks?), and a whole lot more significance in the orientation.

The custodians of Stonehege, English Heritage, won't allow any scientific dating of the stones on site. Doesn't that seem a bit strange? You would think they would be more than happy to allow Optically Stimulated Luminance, which would tell us when the stones were assembled, or Chlorine-36, which would tell us when they were worked. But no, though there has been Chlorine-36 dating of a fragment of stone in a nearby museum which returned a date of 14,000 years. Instead, British archeologists continue with the idea that Stonehenge was built by an emerging agricultural nation as a temple to the dead, and try desperately to associate it with other piles of rock or earth in the area. In fact, every attempt to show how Stonehenge was built is an attempt to show how it could have been built by people with absolutely no knowledge of geometry, geology, astronomy, mechanics or stonemasonry.

Fortunately there is one aspect of Stonehenge which does give an idea of its true age. When the surrounding ditch was excavated to create an inner bank the excavated chalk and soil has protected the underlying bedrock from erosion to the extent it is 30cm (1 ft) higher than the exposed area. This feature, noted by emminent archeologist R. J. C. Atkinson in 1956, is not even mentioned in the extensive English Heritage sponsored re-examination of evidence at the site. Geologically it would take between 8,000-27,000 years for the bedrock to erode this much through the action of acidic rainwater. That's at least 3,000 years more than the archeological date and more in keeping with the Chlorine-36 result, which is itself around the time of the Younger Dryas event and possible cometary impact(s). But it is not so much the date of Stonehenge which is of concern here, it is the alignment.

At present Stonehenge is at latitude 51N and its axis of symmetry is northeast. As stated earlier, it aligns to nothing. Yes, yes, I know some of you will have read about it being at the optimum latitude for Celtic festivals, but we are talking about the 75 stones at the heart of the site and not two small stones on the bank! And as the astronomer Gerald Hawkins has demonstrated no amount of calculation produces alignments of any significance between the large central stones. However, turn the site so that its axis of symmetry points north and place it at latitude 45N and, suddenly, you have an astronomical clock capable of determining just about any solar or lunar event you care to mention (I will leave this part of the discussion here as it is too extensive).

My point is, what happened to move Stonehenge through an arc of some 600km (375 miles) after it was built 14,000 years ago? Or, more specifically, what shifted the Earth or its surface? And Stonehenge is not the only site to have moved - Newgrange in Ireland becomes correctly aligned north-south at the same time. Have there been other shifts? I've looked briefly at the possibility that sites in South America are more significant when aligned north - perhaps there has been more than one shift in the past 14,000 years?

http://www.stonehengeobservatory.com

Please note you will find citations to the facts contained above on the web site.

Hi, Stonehenge! Nibiru has been said to have caused several pole shifts in the past- the most notable & recent one was most likely about 10,800 years ago. According to Nostradamus, at its next passing it may cause another. I think it's why old monuments seem misaligned.

My Native American friends here in the US have known for years from their own prophets that another pole shift will happen soon, & much else. Most have a saying: "From the stars we come, & to the stars we will one day return". All over Ohio where I live, there are mounds & ancient roads over 10,000 years old criss-crossing the entire state; they are placed & aligned similarly to Stonehenge, & were meeting places where Native Americans were said to greet the People of the Stars, especially at certain times of the year. I feel that Stonehenge is another such place (I've been fortunate enough to visit it) & I think the Star People built all of these places. I also think that they make the crop circles- always prevalent in the south of England, but lately they've been turning up in Ohio as well. Deianera